Member Login

Criteria Poor =1 Outstanding= 5
A. Subject Matter: Significant and Original	1 2 3 4 5
B. Study Design: Suitable for Hypothesis	1 2 3 4 5
C. Data Analysis: Appropriate for Study Design	1 2 3 4 5
D. Interpretation of the Results:	1 2 3 4 5
E. References: Appropriate, Seminal & Current	1 2 3 4 5
F. Final Conclusions: Supported by Results	1 2 3 4 5
G. Abstract: Accurate Synopsis of Study	1 2 3 4 5
H. Introduction and Discussion Sections:	1 2 3 4 5
I. References: Appropriate, Seminal & Current	1 2 3 4 5
J. Tables: Understandable	1 2 3 4 5
K. Figure design:	1 2 3 4 5
L. Overall Rating of Manuscript:	1 2 3 4 5

Criteria Poor =1 Outstanding= 5
A. Subject Matter: Significant and Original	1 2 3 4 5
B. Photographs: Clear Representation of Entity	1 2 3 4 5
C. Differential Diagnosis: Complete & Illustrated	1 2 3 4 5
D. Discussion: Surveys the Literature	1 2 3 4 5
E. References: Appropriate, Seminal & Current	1 2 3 4 5

Acrobat Reader required to view PDF documents. If you do not have Acrobat Reader download it here:

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

Annual Scientific Meeting

Join the more than 800 attendees to learn the newest information and technology in ...

eJournal

We are proud to offer you the only online cytology journal club that reviews the most current ...

Case Studies provide an interactive distance-learning experience to interesting cases...

The Progressive Evaluation of Competency (PEC) is designed to track the progress of pathology residents & cytopathology fellows through the year...

Designed with your convenience in mind, these 60-minute multi-media teleconferences address...

Earn CME any time and any place. The ASC provides selections of the Cytoteleconference Series as links.

Consisting of 349 images representing a range of morphologic findings the Web Atlas Bethesda System...

read more